Below is a list of completed state reviews. A brief description is shown along with a link to a file that contains the complete review, available for downloading. To view the file, you may need Adobe Acrobat installed on you computer. Click on the name of the file to view/download it.
|
Tennessee
Review |
9/5/2007 |
|
|
|
|
Get File |
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky
Review |
9/22/2006 |
| |
|
|
Get File |
|
| |
|
| Indiana Review |
9/21/2005 |
|
| Get File |
| |
| Ohio Review |
9/21/2005 |
|
| Get File |
| |
| Oklahoma Review |
9/21/2005 |
|
| Get File |
| |
| Pennsylvania Review |
1/22/2004 |
| |
| Get File |
| |
| Texas Review |
11/5/2003 |
|
This is a follow-up and supplemental review of the Texas program. The
initial Texas review was conducted during calendar year 1992 and published
in April 1993. |
| Get File |
| |
| Louisiana Review |
9/13/2003 |
|
This is a report of the review of the Louisiana oil and gas programs against
the standards of the 2000 Guidelines. The report consists of six main
sections according to the structure of the 2000 Guidelines. |
| Get File |
| |
| Virginia Review |
9/13/2003 |
| This is the report of the review of the Virginia oil and gas programs against the standards of the 2000 Guidelines. It consists of six main sections according to the structure of the 2000 Guidelines. |
| Get File |
| |
| Michigan State Review |
7/23/2003 |
| This is the report of the review of the Michigan oil and gas programs against the standards of the 2000 Guidelines. It consists of six main sections according to the structure of the 2000 Guidelines. |
| Get File |
| |
| West Virginia Review |
1/17/2003 |
| This report consists of two parts. A follow-up review of the progress made since the 1993 Review and a supplemental review of the aspects of West Virginia’s program not covered by the IOGCC Guidelines, but which are addressed in the 2000 Guidelines. |
| Get File |
| |
| California Review |
12/15/2002 |
| This report includes a follow-up review of the progress made by several California state agencies since the original assessment which was published in May 1993. |
| Get File |
| |
| New Mexico Review |
8/15/2001 |
| This report is presented in two parts. Part 1 contains findings and recommendations of the initial review, the New Mexico OCD responses and the follow-up finding of the Review Team. Part 2 presents findings of the Review Team with respect to those aspects of the New Mexico program governed by Standards established in 2000 Guidelines. |
| Get File |
| |
